Time Index
Articles related to Time
An older view of time contrasts time with eternity.
Time is conventional clock-and-calender time: Past, Present, Future,
"eternity" is timelessness., i.e. "no time/"
An older view of time contrasts time with eternity.
Time is conventional clock-and-calender time: Past, Present, Future,
"eternity" is timelessness., i.e. "no time/"
Time and Eternity
A Joint in Time
The Quality of Time
Time’s Arrow
Time During Creation Week
Teach me to Number my Nanoseconds (Psalm 90)
(Tachyons) Faster than the Speed of Light
What is Time? Who is God? (Nathan Wood, Ray Stedman)
The Creation of Everything
Light speed and Cosmology (mp3)
Portals
Time Warps
Times of Stress
The Atomic Constants, Light and Time
Non-Constancy of the Speed of Light
Entropy in the Old Creation
Quantized Red Shifts and ZPE
On the Constancy of the Speed of Light
Absolute Geocentricity
The Light Papers
Articles on Creation
The Electric Universe
Geologic Ages and Real Time
Issues in Science Today
Software not Hardware
Six Hours in Eternity on The Cross
We live in a time/space/mass continuum. Time as we know it is measured only because of space and mass. Mass as we know it certainly cannot exist without space, and if you consider the fact that mass as we know it is dependent upon the movement of atoms, and that is time-related, then mass also cannot exist without the other two: space and time. And space? What is interesting is that the common conception of mass is of ‘nothingness,’ whereas space as we know it is jammed full of something called the Zero Point Energy. There is, quite literally, in our creation no such thing as a physical nothingness.
...The ‘overwhelming evidence’ that the earth is billions of years old lies in a number of faulty dating assumptions and interpretations. It is assumed the rate of radio decay has remained constant through time. It hasn’t. It is assumed that ice core layers are annual. That is also a faulty assumption. Judging the past by the present is a trap many have fallen into, despite the clear evidence in the geological layers themselves of several world-wide catastrophes which would have affected climate variations. The concept of gradualism, in line with a lot of what we see today in terms of change, is a faulty foundation to build on, not only considering the changes we see locally as a result of local catastrophes, but the radical changes we see between basic ‘epochs:’ Archaeozoic to Paleozoic, then Paleozoic to Mesozoic, and, finally Mesozoic to Cenozoic. Evidence in changes of rock types as well as fossil types are clear evidence of some rather startling changes, the likes of which we have not seen in our time. (Barry Setterfield)
